A group of workers from a lower Yakima Valley dairy raised concerns about their working conditions, including the failure of the employer to provide meal and rest breaks, the long hours of work and dangerous working conditions. Columbia Legal Services, along with private co-counsel, Marc Cote, filed a class action on their behalf seeking to change the practices and recover the workers damages for unpaid wages. The workers also challenged the exclusion of farm workers, including dairy workers, from overtime protection under the state Minimum Wage Act.

The non-overtime wage claim damages for the class were settled for $600,000, leaving the constitutional challenge to the exemption of farmworkers from overtime. The Washington State Dairy Federation and the Washington Farm Bureau requested and were granted leave to intervene, so they are now also parties in the case defending against the farmworkers’ challenge.

The case challenges nearly half a century of excluding farm workers from the basic health and safety protection of overtime which is afforded to almost all other workers engaged in dangerous occupations. The exemption is rooted in the racial bias of the New Deal era when political compromises were reached to exclude farm workers and domestic workers in order to get the southern votes needed to pass basic federal protections for workers. This bias was incorporated into Washington law and the exclusion remains today. Because there is no reasonable grounds for the exclusion, and it impacts a fundamental right, it violates the privileges or immunities clause of the state constitution, and also violates the constitutional guarantee of equal protection under the law.

Legislative efforts are also underway at the federal level to extend overtime protection to farm workers.

Who is a farm worker in Washington State?
Definition of who is exempted from overtime under Minimum Wage Act, RCW 49.46.140(2)(g).

Watch the October 24, 2019 WA Supreme Court Oral Argument.



Andrea Schmitt
Andrea Schmitt
Lori Isley
Lori Isley
Joe Morrison
Joe Morrison
Elvia Bueno
Elvia Bueno
Advocacy and Community Engagement Specialist


Washington Supreme Court Rules State’s Exclusion of Dairy Workers from Overtime Pay Is Unconstitutional

Worker Justice | Impact Litigation |
'Washington Supreme Court Rules State’s Exclusion of Dairy Workers from Overtime Pay Is Unconstitutional'

The Washington Supreme Court ruled today in a 5-4 decision that Washington’s 60-year exclusion of dairy workers from overtime pay after 40 hours of work is unconstitutional because the Washington State constitution contains “a fundamental right for Washington workers to health and safety protections” that is embedded in overtime laws. The majority opinion held that the exemption violates the “privileges and immunities” clause of the State constitution, reasoning that the Legislature granted an unconstitutional privilege to agricultural employers by exempting them paying overtime to farmworkers who “work long hours in conditions dangerous to life and deleterious to their health.”

The lawsuit was filed by two dairy workers, Jose Martinez-Cuevas and Patricia Aguilar, both of whom milked cows for DeRuyter Brothers Dairy, Inc., which owned and managed a large dairy operation in Outlook, Washington, with a herd of over 5,000 milking cows. Columbia Legal Services (CLS) and the Seattle law firm Frank Freed Subit & Thomas LLP represent the workers. The workers alleged they worked nine to twelve hours a day, six days a week, without the benefit of paid rest breaks, meal periods, or overtime pay. The company previously settled the meal and rest break portion of the case.

The Court held that the exemption implicated a fundamental constitutional right to statutory protection for health and safety in dangerous industries, under article II, section 35, and there was no reasonable ground for the exemption, rejecting the dairy farmers’ argument that the seasonal nature of farming justified the exemption from overtime pay. As the majority opinion noted, “[D]airy work is some of the most hazardous in the United States,” and “[o]vertime work is particularly injurious.”

“I am very happy we have made the future better – the work is very hard and very dangerous,” said class representative Patricia Aguilar. “This is an incredible victory for farm workers in Washington state,” said Jose Martinez, the other plaintiff in the case. “I’ve had to work lots of overtime hours under very dangerous conditions – just like thousands of other workers around the state. We deserve to be treated like other workers in dangerous industries and be paid fairly for our work.”

The Court’s ruling means that the group of approximately 300 workers in this case is entitled to relief on their overtime claims. In addition, while the majority declined to address whether its decision otherwise applied retroactively, it could impact overtime pay for over 200,000 farm workers across Washington State. As noted by the four dissenting justices, “Based on the majority’s ruling, farm workers will now be entitled to future overtime pay, a substantial benefit.”

“We appreciate the Washington Supreme Court’s decision that recognizes that dairy workers have a right to the same protections as other workers in dangerous industries,” said Lori Isley, attorney with Columbia Legal Services, who argued before the Court last October. “Our clients are equally deserving of overtime pay. Studies have shown that employing workers beyond 40 hours a week causes injury rates to increase, so requiring that employers pay a premium for such work deters use of overtime.”

“Overtime laws are meant to protect workers from long hours that are harmful to their health,” said Marc Cote of Frank Freed Subit & Thomas LLP. “Employees in factories and other dangerous industries are protected under our state’s overtime law, but farm workers have been left out of these protections for decades and must work long hours without overtime pay. We believe the Washington Supreme Court’s opinion today will make overtime pay protection a reality for thousands of laborers who do dangerous agricultural work.”

A concurring opinion by Justice González also highlighted the dangerous conditions farm workers face, while noting the history of a range of federal labor reforms in the New Deal era that excluded farm workers, including the National Labor Relations Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act, and unemployment insurance, stating, “[r]acism directly influenced these exclusionary policies.”

At least four other states (CA, MN, NY, MD) provide overtime protection to agricultural workers.

Media Contacts

Lori Jordan Isley, CLS Attorney

Marc Cote, Attorney

Charlie McAteer, CLS Communications